Player Tier Movements Rules

[Biffa]

Don't agree with you there, having to play more rounds to ensure moving down a level may well discourage it. We can agree to disagree.

You have definitely made it a lot easier for a player to play in 2 tournaments a month and continue to score well in them month after month without going up where as before a player could not do that.

I know, that's why I allowed 20mins per round, not the 12 I take.

you need a reality check mate try getting seasider playing 9 holes in 20 minutes.

We get about 1-2 requests to move up a level per month. If a player wants to play higher irrespective of their scoring, why not? If you read the rules, the top and bottom extremes are ignored and the more players at a level, the more scores ignored.

Irrelevant Andy even 2 players is 2 too many, ignoring top and bottom extremes well them 2 not been there would mean another 2 at top or bottom would have been ignored hence changing the stats.

Letting players move up a Tier is not the same as allowing all to play at their chosen level.

Really? Have they not chosen to play at a higher level? so its ok for those who wish to play at a higher level but not those who wish to play at a lower level? Bit of discrimination going on here.

.which for the umpteenth time, was voted quite categorically against.

Yes that was a farce also i have a screenshot of a member saying a mod was out rallying for votes against it, and you yourself said this
Affo wrote: ↑
Fri Dec 13, 2019 10:07 am
Shame that not even the number of people who have signed up have placed a vote..though I suppose not having a view either is fine too.
But like you say that has gone now, bit like the arguments about the Stableford 9 points change.

[bobfletch]

Just wondered why I cannot 'like' a post in this thread?

[terbal]

Just wondered why I cannot 'like' a post in this thread?

your lucky you havent been transported to austrailia on a convict ship.seems that no one can like a post in this thread hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

[Mwh65]

Neither could I like a reply in this topic.

Fixed now though.

[Perculator]

Neither could I like a reply in this topic.

Fixed now though.

What's to like?

[Mwh65]

I've no idea Perc, but the fact no-one could made me check why

[RandyG]

I've known Charlie for many years, the notion he is a sandbagger doesn't apply at all.
What he is saying is, he likes playing at pro and not tour pro. I feel the same way. It isn't sandbagging if you want to enjoy the game as you prefer.
I do practice allot at TP and the only thing different for me is the aiming and views. I don't do any worst or any better at TP, I just prefer pro settings better for the enjoyment.

I agree that a few have the nack for the game and congrats but if you want to shake up the leader-boards let the players decide if they would like to play at Pro.

A good question to ask is "just how much if any would a TP score at Pro ?"

randy

[Affo]

Interesting Randy, not played at Pro since about 2016 when alternate weeks were for Pro then Amateur. I thought, though not ever proven or confirmed, that the penalties for missed snap and wind effects were greater at TP?

Like I say, don't know for sure.

[terbal]

Interesting Randy, not played at Pro since about 2016 when alternate weeks were for Pro then Amateur. I thought, though not ever proven or confirmed, that the penalties for missed snap and wind effects were greater at TP?

Like I say, don't know for sure.

i didnt find playing at tp that much different than playing at pro except the aiming which in my opinion just slows things down.

[Affo]

So everyone would be happy for me to play Pro then? (if my scores allowed of course )